Using vim as an IDE
Tue 29 December 2015
by
Steven E. Pav
For a number of years now, I have been using vim as a lightweight IDE. The
ecosystem of vim addons is rich. There are numerous plugins for creating tags
to navigate a project, browse files in directories, highlight syntax and so on.
What really makes it an IDE is the ability to execute code within the context
of vim.
I realize this probably sounds 'charming' to disciples of that other
text editor, but it might seem like an unnatural urge to my vim
correligionists. The piece that glues it all together is vim-conque
. The
easiest way to get conque in ubuntu is via apt
as follows:
sudo apt-get install vim-addon-manager vim-conque
sudo vim-addons -w install conqueterm
The skinny on using conque is that you can visual-select code that you are
editing, hit <F9>
, and it will be transfered to the execution window,
newlines and all. So you can test out code while you are writing it. You
can also work the other way, testing out code in a REPL, then, when it is
working as expected, escape insert mode in the REPL, yank the working code to a
register, and copy it into the file you are working on.
Dockerfile or it didn't happen!
This kind of advice is a bit abstract, so I put a working example on
github and
dockerhub. You can run it
yourself via docker:
# this might take a little while to download
docker pull shabbychef/vim-conque
docker run --rm -it shabbychef/vim-conque
This will feel a bit odd: when you run the last command, you are in vim, but
you are in vim in a docker container. When you terminate, your changes will
not be saved (this is the --rm
flag). Directions are given in the file
on how to start conque with a screen …
read more
You Deserve Expensive Champagne ... If You Buy It.
Sat 26 December 2015
by
Steven E. Pav
I received some taster ratings from the champagne party we
attended last week.
I joined the raw ratings with the bottle information to
create a single aggregated dataset.
This is a 'non-normal' form, but simplest to distribute. Here is a taste:
library(dplyr)
library(readr)
library(knitr)
champ <- read_csv('../data/champagne_ratings.csv')
champ %>% select(winery,purchase_price_per_liter,raternum,rating) %>%
head(8) %>% kable(format='markdown')
winery |
purchase_price_per_liter |
raternum |
rating |
Barons de Rothschild |
80.00000 |
1 |
10 |
Onward Petillant Naturel 2014 Malavasia Bianca |
33.33333 |
1 |
4 |
Chandon Rose Method Traditionnelle |
18.66667 |
1 |
8 |
Martini Prosecco from Italy |
21.32000 |
1 |
8 |
Roederer Estate Brut |
33.33333 |
1 |
8 |
Kirkland Asolo Prosecco Superiore |
9.32000 |
1 |
7 |
Champagne Tattinger Brute La Francaise |
46.66667 |
1 |
6 |
Schramsberg Reserver 2001 |
132.00000 |
1 |
6 |
Recall that the rules of the contest dictate that the average rating of each
bottle was computed, then divided by 25 dollars more than the
price (presumably for a 750ml bottle). Depending on whether the average
ratings were compressed around the high end of the zero to ten scale,
or around the low end, one would wager on either the cheapest bottles, or more
moderately priced offerings. (Based on my
previous analysis, I brought the
Menage a Trois Prosecco, rated at 91 points, but available at Safeway for
10 dollars.) It is easy to compute the raw averages using dplyr
:
avrat <- champ %>%
group_by(winery,bottle_num,purchase_price_per_liter) %>%
summarize(avg_rating=mean(rating)) %>%
ungroup() %>%
arrange(desc(avg_rating))
avrat %>% head(8) %>% kable(format='markdown')
winery |
bottle_num |
purchase_price_per_liter |
avg_rating |
Desuderi Jeio |
4 |
22.66667 |
6.750000 |
Gloria Ferrer Sonoma Brut |
19 |
20.00000 |
6.750000 |
Roederer Estate Brut |
12 |
34.66667 |
6.642857 |
Charles Collin Rose |
34 |
33.33333 |
6.636364 |
Roederer Estate Brut |
13 |
33.33333 |
6.500000 |
Gloria Ferrer Sonoma Brut |
11 … |
read more
Champagne Party
Thu 17 December 2015
by
Steven E. Pav
We have been invited to a champagne tasting party and competition.
The rules of the contest are as follows: partygoers bring a bottle
of champagne to share. They taste, then rate the different
champagnes on offer, with ratings on a scale of 1 through 10.
The average rating is computed for each bottle, then
divided by the price (plus some offset) to arrive at an
adjusted quality score. The champagne with the highest score
nets a prize, and considerable bragging rights, for its owner.
Presumably the offset is introduced to prevent small denominators
from dominating the rating, and is advertised to have a value of
around $25. The 'price' is, one infers, for a standard 750 ml bottle.
I decided to do my homework for a change, rather than SWAG it.
I have been doing a lot of web scraping lately, so it was pretty
simple to gather some data on champagnes
from wine dot com. This file includes the advertised and sale prices,
as well as advertised ratings from Wine Spectator (WS), Wine Enthusiast
(WE), and so on. Some of the bottles are odd sizes, so I compute the
cost per liter as well. (By the way, many people would consider the data
collection the hard part of the problem. rvest
made it pretty easy, though.)
Here's a taste:
library(dplyr)
library(magrittr)
champ <- read.csv('../data/champagne.csv')
champ %>% arrange(price_per_liter) %>% head(10) %>% kable(format='markdown')
name |
price |
sale_price |
WS |
WE |
WandS |
WW |
TP |
JS |
ST |
liters |
price_per_liter |
Pol Clement Rose Sec |
8.99 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.75 |
12.0 |
Freixenet Carta Nevada Brut |
8.99 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.75 |
12.0 |
Wolf Blass Yellow Label Brut |
8.99 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA … |
read more